Feb 21
I’m not fully convinced about this.. someone explain
We can either piss around and argue, or we can work together to try and solve whatever it is we’re debating.
Yeah, but what if, hypothetically speaking, someone proposes an argument but I’m right, and I know I’m right, and I can forethink of all the steps it would take to baby the fool I’m chatting with through the idea, and want to circumvent all that and just get straight to the point?
That was a run-on sentence, so how can your point be right?
(is an example)
50 notes | Reblogged: (via)
-
collapsinginfinity reblogged this from stupidclad
-
stupidclad reblogged this from howdidwegetsofaraway
-
stupidclad liked this
-
jimmy-russell reblogged this from andrenator
-
andrenator reblogged this from finegroundmulch
-
panjoga liked this
-
imapwnsta liked this
-
falsedilemmas liked this
-
falsedilemmas reblogged this from howdidwegetsofaraway
-
howdidwegetsofaraway liked this
-
howdidwegetsofaraway reblogged this from finegroundmulch
-
thankyoubasedsantorum liked this
-
letsgroove reblogged this from tylertheexterminatus
-
chocolateaircrafts liked this
-
hautdogg liked this
-
tylertheexterminatus reblogged this from tastefulrebellion and added:
Then why the fuck aren’t you in politics?
-
tastefulrebellion reblogged this from stupidclad
-
finegroundmulch reblogged this from theholysoup
-
pinandmountme liked this
-
4o0z liked this
-
4o0z reblogged this from gen-xer
-
mcgarrsworld liked this
-
defyingfear liked this
-
depressionparty liked this
-
finegroundmulch liked this
-
tylertheexterminatus liked this
-
isnotahero liked this
-
infinitediscovery reblogged this from freight-train-of-thought
-
quietacquisitions liked this
-
little-rivers liked this
-
cherrydusk liked this
-
ponderingsofapersian liked this
-
eloquia liked this
-
victorioushandofgod liked this
